Property Atlas

County hazard profile

Cotton, OK

Oklahoma · pop. 5,520 · FIPS 40033

Very Low
FEMA risk rating · RATING
Drought
dominant hazard
$3M
modeled expected annual loss/yr

Expected annual loss · all 3,232 U.S. counties

among the lowest nationally

national median $15M/yr Cotton $3M

A real dollar distribution: most counties sit far below a handful of high-exposure ones. A FEMA model of annual loss, not a record of disasters.

FEMA national percentile scores

FEMA/CDC score each county 0–100 against all others — the score is the national rank (RATING). Higher risk and vulnerability are worse; higher resilience is better.

FEMA risk indexVery Low 4.9/100
national median ~50 among the lowest nationally
Social vulnerabilityRelatively Moderate 46.22/100
national median ~50 near the national middle (46th percentile)
Community resilienceRelatively Low 35.4/100
national median ~50 lower than most counties (35th percentile)

Recorded · NFIP flood claims RECORDED

Realized flood losses in Cotton

The National Flood Insurance Program has paid 17 flood-insurance claims totaling $161K in Cotton since 2001. The costliest year was 2015 ($66K paid).

Flood-insurance dollars paid by year of loss

2001: $0 paid 2007: $34,604 paid 2015: $66,326 paid 2023: $0 paid 2025: $59,622 paid 2015 · $66K 2001 2025
$161K
total paid
$9,444
average claim
$47K
largest single claim
71%
in high-risk flood zones (A/V)

RECORDED — these are actual paid NFIP claims (a redacted census from OpenFEMA), not a model. They are the realized counterpart to the FEMA risk score above: one is what happened and got paid, the other is what a model predicts.

Scope: these are flood-insurance claims, so they undercount flooding where owners were uninsured — read this as "what NFIP paid here," not "every flood." County-level totals, not a per-property or per-address verdict. Verify a specific address and buy coverage at FloodSmart.gov; the underlying data is OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims.

What these figures mean

  • RATING — the FEMA risk score, expected loss, social vulnerability, and resilience are FEMA/CDC models, not records of disasters that happened. The 0–100 scores are already national percentiles.
  • MEASURED — population is a recorded census figure.
  • COMPUTED — the county's rank within the dollar-loss distribution is our placement over the 3,232 counties.
  • CONTEXT — the note below is framing, not a measurement.

Also available: structured data (JSON-LD) · plain text

What this is — and is not

This is FEMA/CDC modeled hazard exposure for Cotton, OK and where it ranks among U.S. counties. It is not a verdict on whether Cotton is a good or bad place to live — hazard exposure is not place quality, and a county can't opt out of its geography. It is not a per-property or per-address risk assessment, not a prediction of any specific disaster, and not insurance advice. For site-specific risk use a per-property assessment; for the underlying model see FEMA National Risk Index.