Property Atlas

County hazard profile

Lincoln, MT

Montana · pop. 19,614 · FIPS 30053

Relatively Low
FEMA risk rating · RATING
Wildfire
dominant hazard
$16M
modeled expected annual loss/yr

Expected annual loss · all 3,232 U.S. counties

among the lowest nationally

national median $15M/yr Lincoln $16M

A real dollar distribution: most counties sit far below a handful of high-exposure ones. A FEMA model of annual loss, not a record of disasters.

FEMA national percentile scores

FEMA/CDC score each county 0–100 against all others — the score is the national rank (RATING). Higher risk and vulnerability are worse; higher resilience is better.

FEMA risk indexRelatively Low 64.28/100
national median ~50 near the national middle (64th percentile)
Social vulnerabilityVery High 87.18/100
national median ~50 higher than 87% of counties
Community resilienceVery Low 13.74/100
national median ~50 among the lowest nationally

Recorded · NFIP flood claims RECORDED

Realized flood losses in Lincoln

The National Flood Insurance Program has paid 39 flood-insurance claims totaling $447K in Lincoln since 1980. The costliest year was 1996 ($176K paid).

Flood-insurance dollars paid by year of loss

1980: $3,150 paid 1989: $59,352 paid 1990: $68,150 paid 1996: $176,351 paid 1997: $33,859 paid 1998: $1,761 paid 1999: $18,305 paid 2011: $28,591 paid 2012: $1,278 paid 2016: $36,510 paid 2018: $20,152 paid 2026: $0 paid 1996 · $176K 1980 2026
$447K
total paid
$11,473
average claim
$68K
largest single claim
64%
in high-risk flood zones (A/V)

RECORDED — these are actual paid NFIP claims (a redacted census from OpenFEMA), not a model. They are the realized counterpart to the FEMA risk score above: one is what happened and got paid, the other is what a model predicts.

Scope: these are flood-insurance claims, so they undercount flooding where owners were uninsured — read this as "what NFIP paid here," not "every flood." County-level totals, not a per-property or per-address verdict. Verify a specific address and buy coverage at FloodSmart.gov; the underlying data is OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims.

What these figures mean

  • RATING — the FEMA risk score, expected loss, social vulnerability, and resilience are FEMA/CDC models, not records of disasters that happened. The 0–100 scores are already national percentiles.
  • MEASURED — population is a recorded census figure.
  • COMPUTED — the county's rank within the dollar-loss distribution is our placement over the 3,232 counties.
  • CONTEXT — the note below is framing, not a measurement.

Also available: structured data (JSON-LD) · plain text

What this is — and is not

This is FEMA/CDC modeled hazard exposure for Lincoln, MT and where it ranks among U.S. counties. It is not a verdict on whether Lincoln is a good or bad place to live — hazard exposure is not place quality, and a county can't opt out of its geography. It is not a per-property or per-address risk assessment, not a prediction of any specific disaster, and not insurance advice. For site-specific risk use a per-property assessment; for the underlying model see FEMA National Risk Index.