Property Atlas

County hazard profile

Scott, MN

Minnesota · pop. 150,902 · FIPS 27139

Relatively Low
FEMA risk rating · RATING
Strong Wind
dominant hazard
$66M
modeled expected annual loss/yr

Expected annual loss · all 3,232 U.S. counties

among the lowest nationally

national median $15M/yr Scott $66M

A real dollar distribution: most counties sit far below a handful of high-exposure ones. A FEMA model of annual loss, not a record of disasters.

FEMA national percentile scores

FEMA/CDC score each county 0–100 against all others — the score is the national rank (RATING). Higher risk and vulnerability are worse; higher resilience is better.

FEMA risk indexRelatively Low 76.56/100
national median ~50 higher than 77% of counties
Social vulnerabilityVery Low 10.62/100
national median ~50 among the lowest nationally
Community resilienceVery High 97.96/100
national median ~50 among the highest nationally

Recorded · NFIP flood claims RECORDED

Realized flood losses in Scott

The National Flood Insurance Program has paid 117 flood-insurance claims totaling $1.1M in Scott since 1979. The costliest year was 2014 ($362K paid).

Flood-insurance dollars paid by year of loss

1979: $1,473 paid 1980: $8,200 paid 1983: $198,653 paid 1984: $30,576 paid 1985: $466 paid 1987: $1,569 paid 1993: $16,501 paid 1997: $135,379 paid 1998: $20,965 paid 1999: $750 paid 2001: $160,474 paid 2010: $156,140 paid 2011: $32,294 paid 2013: $0 paid 2014: $362,040 paid 2015: $0 paid 2019: $7,409 paid 2024: $0 paid 2014 · $362K 1979 2024
$1.1M
total paid
$9,683
average claim
$185K
largest single claim
74%
in high-risk flood zones (A/V)

RECORDED — these are actual paid NFIP claims (a redacted census from OpenFEMA), not a model. They are the realized counterpart to the FEMA risk score above: one is what happened and got paid, the other is what a model predicts.

Scope: these are flood-insurance claims, so they undercount flooding where owners were uninsured — read this as "what NFIP paid here," not "every flood." County-level totals, not a per-property or per-address verdict. Verify a specific address and buy coverage at FloodSmart.gov; the underlying data is OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims.

What these figures mean

  • RATING — the FEMA risk score, expected loss, social vulnerability, and resilience are FEMA/CDC models, not records of disasters that happened. The 0–100 scores are already national percentiles.
  • MEASURED — population is a recorded census figure.
  • COMPUTED — the county's rank within the dollar-loss distribution is our placement over the 3,232 counties.
  • CONTEXT — the note below is framing, not a measurement.

Also available: structured data (JSON-LD) · plain text

What this is — and is not

This is FEMA/CDC modeled hazard exposure for Scott, MN and where it ranks among U.S. counties. It is not a verdict on whether Scott is a good or bad place to live — hazard exposure is not place quality, and a county can't opt out of its geography. It is not a per-property or per-address risk assessment, not a prediction of any specific disaster, and not insurance advice. For site-specific risk use a per-property assessment; for the underlying model see FEMA National Risk Index.