Property Atlas

County hazard profile

Washington, IN

Indiana · pop. 28,144 · FIPS 18175

Very Low
FEMA risk rating · RATING
Tornado
dominant hazard
$13M
modeled expected annual loss/yr

Expected annual loss · all 3,232 U.S. counties

among the lowest nationally

national median $15M/yr Washington $13M

A real dollar distribution: most counties sit far below a handful of high-exposure ones. A FEMA model of annual loss, not a record of disasters.

FEMA national percentile scores

FEMA/CDC score each county 0–100 against all others — the score is the national rank (RATING). Higher risk and vulnerability are worse; higher resilience is better.

FEMA risk indexVery Low 40.94/100
national median ~50 near the national middle (41st percentile)
Social vulnerabilityRelatively Low 37.47/100
national median ~50 lower than most counties (37th percentile)
Community resilienceRelatively Low 36.86/100
national median ~50 lower than most counties (37th percentile)

Recorded · NFIP flood claims RECORDED

Realized flood losses in Washington

The National Flood Insurance Program has paid 58 flood-insurance claims totaling $2.7M in Washington since 1988. The costliest year was 2004 ($1.2M paid).

Flood-insurance dollars paid by year of loss

1988: $0 paid 1990: $225,325 paid 1995: $1,336 paid 1996: $58,172 paid 1997: $3,775 paid 2001: $0 paid 2002: $33,665 paid 2004: $1,238,719 paid 2005: $66,259 paid 2006: $44,950 paid 2008: $264,626 paid 2015: $0 paid 2017: $752,559 paid 2018: $50,230 paid 2025: $4,975 paid 2004 · $1.2M 1988 2025
$2.7M
total paid
$47,321
average claim
$1.0M
largest single claim
59%
in high-risk flood zones (A/V)

RECORDED — these are actual paid NFIP claims (a redacted census from OpenFEMA), not a model. They are the realized counterpart to the FEMA risk score above: one is what happened and got paid, the other is what a model predicts.

Scope: these are flood-insurance claims, so they undercount flooding where owners were uninsured — read this as "what NFIP paid here," not "every flood." County-level totals, not a per-property or per-address verdict. Verify a specific address and buy coverage at FloodSmart.gov; the underlying data is OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims.

What these figures mean

  • RATING — the FEMA risk score, expected loss, social vulnerability, and resilience are FEMA/CDC models, not records of disasters that happened. The 0–100 scores are already national percentiles.
  • MEASURED — population is a recorded census figure.
  • COMPUTED — the county's rank within the dollar-loss distribution is our placement over the 3,232 counties.
  • CONTEXT — the note below is framing, not a measurement.

Also available: structured data (JSON-LD) · plain text

What this is — and is not

This is FEMA/CDC modeled hazard exposure for Washington, IN and where it ranks among U.S. counties. It is not a verdict on whether Washington is a good or bad place to live — hazard exposure is not place quality, and a county can't opt out of its geography. It is not a per-property or per-address risk assessment, not a prediction of any specific disaster, and not insurance advice. For site-specific risk use a per-property assessment; for the underlying model see FEMA National Risk Index.