Property Atlas

County hazard profile

Naugatuck Valley, CT

Connecticut · pop. 450,296 · FIPS 09140

Relatively Moderate
FEMA risk rating · RATING
Riverine Flooding
dominant hazard
$140M
modeled expected annual loss/yr

Expected annual loss · all 3,232 U.S. counties

near the national middle (43rd percentile)

national median $15M/yr Naugatuck Valley $140M

A real dollar distribution: most counties sit far below a handful of high-exposure ones. A FEMA model of annual loss, not a record of disasters.

FEMA national percentile scores

FEMA/CDC score each county 0–100 against all others — the score is the national rank (RATING). Higher risk and vulnerability are worse; higher resilience is better.

FEMA risk indexRelatively Moderate 93.19/100
national median ~50 among the highest nationally
Social vulnerabilityRelatively Low 35.69/100
national median ~50 lower than most counties (36th percentile)
Community resilienceRelatively High 77.19/100
national median ~50 higher than 77% of counties

What these figures mean

  • RATING — the FEMA risk score, expected loss, social vulnerability, and resilience are FEMA/CDC models, not records of disasters that happened. The 0–100 scores are already national percentiles.
  • MEASURED — population is a recorded census figure.
  • COMPUTED — the county's rank within the dollar-loss distribution is our placement over the 3,232 counties.
  • CONTEXT — the note below is framing, not a measurement.

Also available: structured data (JSON-LD) · plain text

What this is — and is not

This is FEMA/CDC modeled hazard exposure for Naugatuck Valley, CT and where it ranks among U.S. counties. It is not a verdict on whether Naugatuck Valley is a good or bad place to live — hazard exposure is not place quality, and a county can't opt out of its geography. It is not a per-property or per-address risk assessment, not a prediction of any specific disaster, and not insurance advice. For site-specific risk use a per-property assessment; for the underlying model see FEMA National Risk Index.